Thursday, November 13, 2025
No Result
View All Result
FMLaw
  • Building and Construction
  • Charitable
  • Commercial
  • Dispute Resolution
  • Employment and Human Rights
  • Franchising
    • Franchisee
    • Franchisor
  • Property
  • Relationship Property
  • Retirement
  • Transport
  • Trust, Wills, Estates and Enduring Powers of Attorney
FMLaw
  • Building and Construction
  • Charitable
  • Commercial
  • Dispute Resolution
  • Employment and Human Rights
  • Franchising
    • Franchisee
    • Franchisor
  • Property
  • Relationship Property
  • Retirement
  • Transport
  • Trust, Wills, Estates and Enduring Powers of Attorney
No Result
View All Result
FMLaw
No Result
View All Result
Home Commercial

Active Planet 2015 Ltd fined for illegal guiding

by fmlaw news
March 12, 2020
in Commercial
0
Active Planet 2015 Ltd fined for illegal guiding
0
SHARES
99
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Active Planet 2015 Ltd, a tourism company, was fined on 3 March at Pukekohe District Court for charges related to illegally guiding on public conservation land, the Department of Conservation says(*).

DOC says the fines totalled $12,000 and Active Planet was fined $4,000 on each of three charges by Judge Kevin Phillips.

“Active Planet specialised in tours for international students across the north and south islands. The company was prosecuted by DOC and pled guilty in October 2018 to commercial guiding without authorisation at Pelorus Bridge Scenic Reserve, Pancake Rocks in Paparoa National Park, and at Blue Pools in Mount Aspiring National Park,” DOC says.

Marta Lang Silveira, DOC’s National Compliance Manager, says that DOC rangers and compliance officers had spoken with the company on a number of occasions prior to October 2018. DOC asked the company to apply for a concession (a permit to operate) after learning it was guiding commercially in a wide range of conservation areas, none of which it held a concession for. It did not complete the application process but continued to run tours illegally.

DOC says Judge Phillips commented that Active Planet had been informed of the need for a concession by DOC, making this offending blatant and premeditated.

“The Judge noted that the fine, in this case, reflected the company’s financial circumstances, and in other cases, much higher penalties may be imposed.”

DOC says the maximum penalty a court can impose for guiding for commercial purposes without a concession is a fine of up to $300,000, or imprisonment of individuals for up to 5 years.

Companies or individuals wishing to operate a business or commercial activity on public conservation lands and waters need a concession from DOC. It is illegal to do so without a concession.

DOC says it has been boosting its compliance efforts, including running a summer compliance programme in tourist hotspots over the last and current summer season.

Source:

  • https://www.lawsociety.org.nz/news-and-communications/latest-news/news/active-planet-2015-ltd-fined-for-illegal-guiding
  • (*) https://www.doc.govt.nz/news/media-releases/2020-media-releases/company-fined-$12000-for-operating-illegally-at-iconic-tourist-spots/
fmlaw news

fmlaw news

Related Posts

Start using standards for better business

Start using standards for better business

by fmlaw news
January 13, 2025
0

We’re sharing all the ways that standards can help your business improve and grow. In a nutshell, standards are the...

TikTok, content creators enlist lawyers to challenge US divestment law

TikTok, content creators enlist lawyers to challenge US divestment law

by fmlaw news
January 4, 2025
0

International firm partner and law professor retained by TikTok and content creators, respectively TikTok and a group of its content...

What to do when products are unsafe

What to do when products are unsafe

by fmlaw news
October 11, 2024
0

You may need to undertake a product recall if a product you sell has safety concerns, falls short of a...

High Court affirms immunity for foreign state-owned entities in winding-up proceedings

High Court affirms immunity for foreign state-owned entities in winding-up proceedings

by fmlaw news
October 8, 2024
0

The case involves an airline facing demands for unpaid debts amounting to over US$ 400 million The High Court recently...

Next Post
Human Rights Commission supports anti-deportation petition

Human Rights Commission supports anti-deportation petition

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recommended

The Timeshare Property Transfer Model

The Importance of Keeping your Will Valid all the Time

5 years ago
Court of Appeal clarifies rules on application for an extension of time to file an appeal

Court of Appeal clarifies rules on application for an extension of time to file an appeal

2 years ago
FMLaw

© 2024 FMLaws News keeps you fully updated of the latest law in New Zealand.

Navigate Site

  • Building and Construction
  • Charitable
  • Commercial
  • Dispute Resolution
  • Employment and Human Rights
  • Franchising
  • Property
  • Relationship Property
  • Retirement
  • Transport
  • Trust, Wills, Estates and Enduring Powers of Attorney

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Building and Construction
  • Charitable
  • Commercial
  • Dispute Resolution
  • Employment and Human Rights
  • Franchising
    • Franchisee
    • Franchisor
  • Property
  • Relationship Property
  • Retirement
  • Transport
  • Trust, Wills, Estates and Enduring Powers of Attorney

© 2024 FMLaws News keeps you fully updated of the latest law in New Zealand.

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In