Saturday, October 11, 2025
No Result
View All Result
FMLaw
  • Building and Construction
  • Charitable
  • Commercial
  • Dispute Resolution
  • Employment and Human Rights
  • Franchising
    • Franchisee
    • Franchisor
  • Property
  • Relationship Property
  • Retirement
  • Transport
  • Trust, Wills, Estates and Enduring Powers of Attorney
FMLaw
  • Building and Construction
  • Charitable
  • Commercial
  • Dispute Resolution
  • Employment and Human Rights
  • Franchising
    • Franchisee
    • Franchisor
  • Property
  • Relationship Property
  • Retirement
  • Transport
  • Trust, Wills, Estates and Enduring Powers of Attorney
No Result
View All Result
FMLaw
No Result
View All Result
Home The High Court and Law Society Statements

Courts ease safety and operational protocols as protection framework lifts

by fmlaw news
November 14, 2022
in The High Court and Law Society Statements
0
Courts ease safety and operational protocols as protection framework lifts
0
SHARES
44
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

With Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern officially dropping the COVID-19 Protection Framework this week, courts across New Zealand have made changes to their current COVID-19 safety and operational protocols.

Significant changes in the protocols generally involved mask-wearing and COVID-19 testing requirements. Below are the key highlights of the newly revised protocols of the Supreme Court, the Court of Appeal, the High Court, and the District Court. All the revised protocols took effect on 13 September.

Supreme Court and Court of Appeal

A person may not enter the Supreme Court or the Court of Appeal if they are showing signs of illness or tested positive for COVID-19 within the last seven days. All persons entering either court may wear masks inside the building. However, masks must be worn inside the courtroom if the presiding judge so directs.

All appeal hearings and hearings for applications for leave to appeal before the Supreme Court will be conducted in person unless a judge directs otherwise. Similarly, all hearings scheduled in the Court of Appeal will be conducted in person unless a judge rules otherwise. A party, counsel, or other participant may apply to join a remote hearing.

A court participant who has any COVID-19 symptoms must take a rapid antigen test (RAT) before attending a hearing. If they test negative and the symptoms are minor, they may attend the hearing but must wear a mask at all times. But if they test negative and the symptoms are severe, they must not appear in court unless a judge so directs. If they test positive, they must not attend the hearing.

A judge may direct that some or all participants in a hearing, which exceeds one day, take a RAT in the morning before entering the court if the judge is satisfied that it is reasonably necessary to do so in the interests of justice and to protect health and safety in court.

Court participants tested positive for COVID-19 must not attend hearings, and if already in the courtroom, must promptly leave.

High Court and District Court

A person may not enter the High Court or the District Court building if they are showing signs of illness or has tested positive for COVID-19 within the last seven days. A criminal defendant, whose court attendance is required but is unwell or has recently tested positive for COVID-19, should notified the court prior to the date of their appearance. The defendant will then be advised by the registry whether they are required to attend court on that date or on a different one.

All criminal and civil matters scheduled for hearing before the High Court will be conducted in person unless a judge directs otherwise. Likewise, all criminal matters pending before the District Court will be heard in person unless a judge rules otherwise.

A party may request that a matter be conducted with all participants appearing remotely. The request should be made within five working days before the scheduled hearing. A party, counsel, or other participant may also apply to participate in a remote hearing within the same period.

Mask-wearing and RAT testing requirements are similar to those being implemented by the higher courts. For conducting jury trials, the following rules apply:

  • Summonsed jurors may be directed to attend a different location from other court attendees;
  • Summonsed jurors selected as jury panel members will be provided with KN95 masks;
  • The jury empanelling process will be carried out in accordance with the Jury Rules 1990. This will include remote pre-balloting of jurors and use of alternative premises or additional courtrooms to safely accommodate the jury panel during the empanelling process;
  • Summonsed jurors will be kept together for the minimum time;
  • If a juror or court participant tested positive for COVID-19, they must not attend court, and if already inside the courtroom, must promptly leave;
  • If a juror or court participant is a household contact of a person with COVID-19, the presiding judge will determine whether they may continue to participate in the hearing.

Source: thelawyermag.com

(*) If there are any copyright-related issues regarding the articles published on our website, please do not hesitate to contact us. We would handle the request accordingly.

fmlaw news

fmlaw news

Related Posts

Law Society welcomes Select Committee report on Gangs Legislation Amendment Bill

Law Society welcomes Select Committee report on Gangs Legislation Amendment Bill

by fmlaw news
February 26, 2025
0

The New Zealand Law Society Te Kāhui Ture o Aotearoa recently submitted on the Gangs Legislation Amendment Bill. Last week...

International Bar Association releases report on AI’s impact and ethical governance in law

International Bar Association releases report on AI’s impact and ethical governance in law

by fmlaw news
February 18, 2025
0

While law firms see AI as a competitive advantage, they have yet to develop policies for its use The International...

Law Society sounds warning over proposed ram raid legislation

Law Society sounds warning over proposed ram raid legislation

by fmlaw news
November 21, 2024
0

The Law Society’s Youth Justice Committee convenor Dale Lloyd says criminalising ram raid offending by children and young people is...

Legal bodies push back against pitched NSW knife ‘wanding’ legislation

Legal bodies push back against pitched NSW knife ‘wanding’ legislation

by fmlaw news
October 5, 2024
0

Parliament is being encouraged to modify the laws to protect civil liberties Legal bodies have pushed back against knife “wanding”...

Next Post
Working remotely has become a top priority for lawyers: ABA report

Working remotely has become a top priority for lawyers: ABA report

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recommended

Justice Minister welcomes stay of proceedings to High Court ‘501’ ruling

Justice Minister welcomes stay of proceedings to High Court ‘501’ ruling

3 years ago
COVID-19 and Employment

COVID-19 and Employment

5 years ago
FMLaw

© 2024 FMLaws News keeps you fully updated of the latest law in New Zealand.

Navigate Site

  • Building and Construction
  • Charitable
  • Commercial
  • Dispute Resolution
  • Employment and Human Rights
  • Franchising
  • Property
  • Relationship Property
  • Retirement
  • Transport
  • Trust, Wills, Estates and Enduring Powers of Attorney

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Building and Construction
  • Charitable
  • Commercial
  • Dispute Resolution
  • Employment and Human Rights
  • Franchising
    • Franchisee
    • Franchisor
  • Property
  • Relationship Property
  • Retirement
  • Transport
  • Trust, Wills, Estates and Enduring Powers of Attorney

© 2024 FMLaws News keeps you fully updated of the latest law in New Zealand.

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In