Thursday, November 13, 2025
No Result
View All Result
FMLaw
  • Building and Construction
  • Charitable
  • Commercial
  • Dispute Resolution
  • Employment and Human Rights
  • Franchising
    • Franchisee
    • Franchisor
  • Property
  • Relationship Property
  • Retirement
  • Transport
  • Trust, Wills, Estates and Enduring Powers of Attorney
FMLaw
  • Building and Construction
  • Charitable
  • Commercial
  • Dispute Resolution
  • Employment and Human Rights
  • Franchising
    • Franchisee
    • Franchisor
  • Property
  • Relationship Property
  • Retirement
  • Transport
  • Trust, Wills, Estates and Enduring Powers of Attorney
No Result
View All Result
FMLaw
No Result
View All Result
Home Dispute Resolution

Family dispute resolution: 5 most common questions – answered

by fmlaw news
June 15, 2022
in Dispute Resolution
0
Family dispute resolution: 5 most common questions – answered
0
SHARES
165
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Family disputes can be among the most challenging cases in the area of dispute resolution. Under the Care of Children Act 2004, the Family Court generally cannot hear a dispute unless you have already attempted to reach an agreement through family dispute resolution (FDR). Nonetheless, over 80% of parties reach an agreement through mediation according to Fair Way Resolution senior resolution practitioner Denise Evans, making FDR a cheaper, less formal and faster process than litigation.

What are the facts about family dispute resolution? Here are answers to five common questions about the FDR process.

How does family dispute resolution work?

FDR is a type of mediation service that is often a prerequisite to filing proceedings in Family Court. During the FDR process, an independent mediator approved by an organisation such as the New Zealand Law Society, the Arbitrators and Mediators Institute of New Zealand or the Association of Dispute Resolvers is called upon to help parents and guardians in their attempt to resolve a dispute and to make decisions that are in the best interests of their children.

Prior to the FDR proper, the family mediator meets with each party separately to discuss the dispute and to offer counselling or a preparation session if necessary. During the FDR process, the mediator focuses on issues like how you will co-parent your children, how you will pick up and drop off your children, and where your children will spend the holidays and other celebrations. The mediator will also assist in cultivating skills to resolve future disputes.

When is the time you should look for mediation?

Before filing proceedings in Family Court, you must have completed an FDR mediation process in the last 12 months. Nonetheless, you may be exempt from participating in FDR if you are seeking an urgent parenting order – for example, due to family violence or if a child’s safety is at risk.

What should you look for as a mediator?

The Ministry of Justice points out that a mediator’s role does not extend to making decisions for the parties. Rather, you should identify the key issues in a family dispute and facilitate a discussion that aids the parties in reaching an agreement that serves the welfare and interests of the children.

Evans recommends conducting a careful questioning process to shed light on the fears of each party, such as the fear of being shut out of their children’s lives, fear they are not well-equipped to be a single parent, or fear of loss of respect. By creating an open and honest environment where both parties have a chance to express their concerns and perspectives, you can assist the parties in making decisions and arrangements that will serve them throughout their parenting lives.

Do you need to pay for family dispute resolution?

If your income is below a certain threshold, you may qualify for free FDR and any preparatory counselling. You may also be entitled to free legal advice from the Family Legal Advice Service.

The Family Court has posted a financial eligibility table on its website to help families determine whether they are eligible for these benefits. Moreover, if you do not qualify for free family dispute resolution, you may pay up to $448.50 for your share of the cost of a funded mediator, the Ministry of Justice says.

What if you and your ex-partner are not able to reach a resolution?

If you are not able to resolve your issues through FDR, you may apply to the Family Court within 12 months of completing the mediation process.

You may also apply to the court if you are not satisfied with the arrangements made during family dispute resolution following a trial period. However, the court has the discretion to determine the appropriateness of a challenge to the mediation outcome – for instance, if you have simply changed your mind or feel you were pressured into an agreement.

Source: thelawyermag.com

(*) If there are any copyright-related issues regarding the articles published on our website, please do not hesitate to contact us. We would handle the request accordingly.

fmlaw news

fmlaw news

Related Posts

Federal Court declares misleading conduct in wine labelling dispute

Federal Court declares misleading conduct in wine labelling dispute

by fmlaw news
November 13, 2024
0

Wine company represented its wine as having an affiliation with a prestigious Bordeaux winery The Federal Court has ruled that...

Federal Court clarifies the meaning of ‘consumer’ in dispute over cinema seating

Federal Court clarifies the meaning of ‘consumer’ in dispute over cinema seating

by fmlaw news
August 6, 2024
0

The dispute concerns the quality of the seats installed by the defendant in the cinema The Federal Court has ruled...

NSW Supreme Court resolves settlement funds dispute

NSW Supreme Court resolves settlement funds dispute

by fmlaw news
June 11, 2024
0

The dispute stemmed from a slip and fall incident in a Coles supermarket The NSW Supreme Court has issued orders...

Court of Appeal refuses to admit privileged evidence in employment dispute against BNZ

Court of Appeal refuses to admit privileged evidence in employment dispute against BNZ

by fmlaw news
March 12, 2024
0

An employee claimed she was unjustifiably dismissed and disadvantaged by the bank The Court of Appeal has upheld the privileged...

Next Post
Parliament passes legislation to further protect whistle-blowers in workplaces

Parliament passes legislation to further protect whistle-blowers in workplaces

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recommended

Improve the sustainability of your supply chain

Improve the sustainability of your supply chain

3 years ago
Court of Appeal upholds striking out a claim that psychiatry is ‘quackery’

Court of Appeal upholds striking out a claim that psychiatry is ‘quackery’

2 years ago
FMLaw

© 2024 FMLaws News keeps you fully updated of the latest law in New Zealand.

Navigate Site

  • Building and Construction
  • Charitable
  • Commercial
  • Dispute Resolution
  • Employment and Human Rights
  • Franchising
  • Property
  • Relationship Property
  • Retirement
  • Transport
  • Trust, Wills, Estates and Enduring Powers of Attorney

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Building and Construction
  • Charitable
  • Commercial
  • Dispute Resolution
  • Employment and Human Rights
  • Franchising
    • Franchisee
    • Franchisor
  • Property
  • Relationship Property
  • Retirement
  • Transport
  • Trust, Wills, Estates and Enduring Powers of Attorney

© 2024 FMLaws News keeps you fully updated of the latest law in New Zealand.

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In